Balancing the Middle East: The United States’ Strategic Ambiguity in the Iran-Israel Conflict

Downloads

Download the Article:

Authors

  • Mohammed Kabeer Garba PhD Scholar, ECOWAS Parliament, Abuja, Nigeria Author
  • Jibrin Hussaini Abubakar Kaduna State University, Department of Political Science, Abuja, Nigeria Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55559/ijchss.v2i1.14

Keywords:

Strategic Ambiguity, U.S. Foreign Policy, Iran-Israel Conflict, Nuclear Diplomacy, Middle East Security, Alliance Management

Abstract

This study explores the application of strategic ambiguity by the United States in dealing with Iran-Israel dispute, especially nuclear diplomacy and regional security. The U.S. has been in an uncompromising security alliance with Israel but at the same time, it has been conducting diplomatic talks with Iran including the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). The study explores how past administrations of the United States have juggled this fine line using a qualitative approach and policy analysis that has seen to it that succeeding administrations have sent both welcoming and threatening signals to their allies and foes. Results indicate that strategic ambiguity has helped in providing flexibility in the short term but has also helped encourage mistrust, regional build up, and uncertainty in the credibility of the U.S. foreign policy. The paper states that although ambiguity has been cannibalized to fulfill some tactical ends, in the circumstances of changing geopolitical forces, it is not sustainable in the long run. The study highlights that a rebalanced approach, which balances transparency with regional stability and non-proliferation, is necessary.

References

Byman, D. (2021). Iran and the bomb: The dangers of brinkmanship. Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu

Cordesman, A. H. (2019). U.S. military aid to Israel: Strategic implications and future challenges (CSIS Report). Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://www.csis.org

Gause, F. G. III. (2010). The international relations of the Persian Gulf. Cambridge University Press.

Kaye, D. D. (2018). A nuclear agreement with Iran: Lessons for international monitoring and verification (RAND Report). RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org

Kroenig, M. (2018). The return of great power rivalry: Democracy versus autocracy from the ancient world to the U.S. and China. Oxford University Press.

Makdisi, K. (2024). The new Cold War in the Middle East: Iran, the Gulf, and proxy warfare. Middle East Policy, 31(1), 22–40.

Parsi, T. (2017). Losing an enemy: Obama, Iran, and the triumph of diplomacy. Yale University Press.

Sagan, S. D. (2020). The case for no first use. Survival, 62(1), 85–102.

Schelling, T. C. (2008). Arms and influence (2nd ed.). Yale University Press. (Original work published 1966)

Takeyh, R. (2021). The last Shah: America, Iran, and the fall of the Pahlavi dynasty. Yale University Press.

United Nations Security Council. (2015). Resolution 2231 (2015): Endorsing the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/content/resolutions-adopted-security-council-2015

Walt, S. M. (2010). The Israel lobby and U.S. foreign policy. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Walt, S. M., & Mearsheimer, J. J. (2007). The Israel lobby. London Review of Books, 29(6), 3–12.

Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press.

Published on:

03-03-2026

Also Available On

Note: Third-party indexing sometime takes time. Please wait one week or two for indexing. Validate this article's Schema Markup on Schema.org

How to Cite

Garba, M. K., & Abubakar, J. H. (2026). Balancing the Middle East: The United States’ Strategic Ambiguity in the Iran-Israel Conflict. International Journal of Contemporary Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 25-29. https://doi.org/10.55559/ijchss.v2i1.14

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.